http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/ When the pupil is ready to learn, a teacher will appear. Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:57:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/comment-page-1/#comment-24 TheArthur Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:31:00 +0000 http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/#comment-24 try-harder! try-harder!

]]> http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Christophe Grand Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:48:00 +0000 http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/#comment-22 grayswx: some is a function (plus it takes a predicate), or is a macro. I think try-or is better. grayswx: some is a function (plus it takes a predicate), or is a macro. I think try-or is better.

]]> http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/comment-page-1/#comment-21 grayswx Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:28:00 +0000 http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/#comment-21 It most closely matches the existing function some. So maybe try-some? It most closely matches the existing function some. So maybe try-some?

]]> http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/comment-page-1/#comment-16 lpetit Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:39:00 +0000 http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/#comment-16 why not 'try-one ? why not ‘try-one ?

]]> http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/comment-page-1/#comment-15 Shawn Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:28:00 +0000 http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/#comment-15 No, never mind. try-or No, never mind. try-or

]]> http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/comment-page-1/#comment-14 Shawn Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:27:00 +0000 http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2009/01/08/try-or-or-try-try-else-or-else-try/#comment-14 try-cond try-cond

]]>